1. Catalogs
  2. RKB Europe
  3. RKB Optimal Design of Rolling-Contact Bearings Via Evolutionary Algorithms
video corpo

RKB Optimal Design of Rolling-Contact Bearings Via Evolutionary Algorithms

RKB Optimal Design of Rolling-Contact Bearings Via Evolutionary Algorithms
1 / 13 PagesView full catalog

RKB Optimal Design of Rolling-Contact Bearings Via Evolutionary Algorithms

Product catalog summary
Abstract: The document discusses the application of Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) by RKB Bearing Industries for optimizing the design of rolling-contact bearings, emphasizing the benefits over conventional designs and presenting a case study on cylindrical roller bearings.
1. Optimal Design in Modern Engineering: Optimal design in engineering seeks the best solution by considering factors like design, manufacturing, and logistics. It involves solving a mathematical programming problem based on real engineering models to address the complexity of modern products.
2. Structure of Mathematical Programming Problems: Optimization requires selecting the best element from alternatives using mathematical programming, which includes decision variables, objective functions, and constraints. These can be mono-objective or multi-objective.
3. Optimal Design versus Conventional Design: Conventional design often involves pre-dimensioning and solving equations with single unknowns, which may not yield optimal solutions. Optimal design integrates all aspects into a single process, enhancing resource utilization and reducing the need for modifications.
4. Conceiving the Mathematical Programming Problem: This involves identifying parameters, establishing objective functions, and setting constraints. The choice of these elements is crucial, and Evolutionary Algorithms are recommended for solving such problems.
5. Mono-objective and Multi-objective Optimization: Mono-objective optimization focuses on a single goal, while multi-objective optimization addresses multiple, often conflicting objectives. Pareto optimality is a key concept, providing a set of solutions that balance different objectives.
Introduction to Pareto Optimization: Pareto optimization involves a set of solutions where improving one objective deteriorates another, visualized as a Pareto front, especially in bi-objective scenarios.
Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs): EAs are flexible optimization techniques inspired by natural selection, suitable for complex problems. They involve reproduction, mutation, and survival of the fittest, evolving a population of solutions over time. Memetic Algorithms (MAs) enhance searches by incorporating domain knowledge.
Advantages of Evolutionary Algorithms: EAs are noted for their general-purpose problem-solving capabilities, robustness, and similarity to human design processes, making them suitable for complex systems where improvement is prioritized over absolute optimization.
Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEAs): MOEAs are advanced techniques evolving from first-generation methods to second-generation methods emphasizing efficiency and elitism, applied to high-dimensional problems.
Application to Rolling-Contact Bearings: The document explores EAs in optimizing rolling-contact bearings, focusing on maximizing fatigue life and dynamic load ratings. It discusses historical approaches and recent advancements, including realistic constraints and roller profile effects.
Introduction: The document highlights the use of MOEAs in optimizing rolling-contact bearings, focusing on parameter optimization to enhance performance.
Optimization Techniques and Findings:
  • Gupta et al. (2007): Used NSGA II to optimize deep-groove ball bearings, focusing on dynamic and static load ratings and film thickness.
  • Savsani et al. (2009): Improved results with modified particle swarm optimization, confirming Gupta's findings.
  • Wei and Chengzu (2010): Optimized high-speed angular contact ball bearings, improving rating life and reducing frictional power loss.
Case Study: RKB NP 1092 Bearing: RKB applied MOEAs to design the NP 1092 cylindrical roller bearing, focusing on maximizing load rating and lubricant film thickness, identifying nine constraints related to roller dimensions and stress limits.
Optimization Results: Using a custom platform based on EAs, the Pareto front analysis revealed optimal configurations balancing load capacity and lubricant film thickness.
Conclusions: EAs are effective in optimizing complex systems like rolling-contact bearings, supporting their use for designing high-performance bearings with enhanced load capacities and reduced friction. RKB's research continues to explore the impact of roller and raceway profiles on load ratings.
References: The document cites various studies contributing to the development and application of genetic algorithms and evolutionary computation in bearing design.
See more

Catalog excerpts

RKB Optimal Design of Rolling-Contact Bearings Via Evolutionary Algorithms-1

OPTIMAL DESIGN OF ROLLING-CONTACT BEARINGS VIA EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS RKB TECHNICAL REVIEW - APRIL 2011 Optimal Design of Rolling-Contact Bearings Via Evolutionary Algorithms Lucian Tudose, Cristina Stanescu RKB Bearing Industries - Advanced Calculations and Optimization Department Abstract: RKB Bearing Industries Group has been using Evolutionary Algorithms for long, well aware that optimized products can make a difference in performance compared to the other producers. This paper is a brief review of the main aspects of the optimal design and a report on the achievements of the RKB Advanced Calculations and Optimization Department in the field. The differences between optimal design and conventional design are pointed out by way of a very simple example of mechanical design. Multi-objective optimal design via Evolutionary Algorithms of a specific cylindrical roller bearing is also presented. Key words: Optimization, Bearing, Evolutionary algorithms, Optimal design 1. Optimal design in modern engineering Optimization is an important concept in engineering. Finding any solution to a problem is not nearly as good as finding the one optimal solution to the problem. In the last decades the complexity of conceived products have met an extraordinary growth and it is estimated that, in the near future, designing a product will have to take into consideration a multitude of factors including actual design, manufacturing and logistics (supplying and distribution). The ever growing complexity of design problems obviously requires appropriate instruments. The present tendency in technical design of products is optimal design, which means conceiving and solving a mathematical programming problem based on the mathematical model of a real engineering problem. 2. Structure of mathematical programming problems In mathematics, optimization, or mathematical programming, refers to choosing the best element from some set of available alternatives. Often, this number of possible alternatives is infinite or, at least, very high in computational time terms. It is worth noting here that the term mathematical programming is not directly related to computer programming. A mathematical programming problem has to fit to a certain format. Let the decision (design) variable vector be: x x1, x 2 , ... , x p and suppose that its components are laying in the ranges: l l u l u x1 x1, x1 , x 2 x 2 , x 2 , ... , x p x p , x u p Consider also the objective function (mono-objective optimization) or objective functions (multi-objective optimization) and a set of constraints (all of these are functions of the decision vector x ). Note that mono-objective optimization and multi-objective optimization respectively are two totally different approaches as will be seen in the following pages. To solve this mathematical programming problem means that one has to find x so that: f1 x min or max f x min or max objective function(s): 2 fm x min or max 1

 Open the catalog to page 1
RKB Optimal Design of Rolling-Contact Bearings Via Evolutionary Algorithms-2

OPTIMAL DESIGN OF ROLLING-CONTACT BEARINGS VIA EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS RKB TECHNICAL REVIEW - APRIL 2011 g1 x 0 g 2 x 0 constraints: g q x 0 where the sign “ ” should be read “less than” or “less than or equal to” or even “equal to” as appropriate. 3. Optimal design versus conventional design To fully understand the fundamental differences between conventional and optimal design will address a simple statement of the design of machine parts. The main problem in the field of mechanical design work is the dimensioning (sizing) of machine parts according to some known requirements. Sometimes you...

 Open the catalog to page 2
RKB Optimal Design of Rolling-Contact Bearings Via Evolutionary Algorithms-3

OPTIMAL DESIGN OF ROLLING-CONTACT BEARINGS VIA EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS RKB TECHNICAL REVIEW - APRIL 2011 Let's illustrate the above considerations by approaching a very simple design problem: the tubular beam of length L in figure 1 is centrally loaded by force F. Knowing the material of the beam, the problem is to find the values of outer diameter Do and inner diameter Di of the beam. The only equation available for dimensioning is the well-known bending stress equation: σb 16 F L Do 4 π Do Di4 Since there are two unknowns (Do and Di) and only one equation, in conventional design, one of the...

 Open the catalog to page 3
RKB Optimal Design of Rolling-Contact Bearings Via Evolutionary Algorithms-4

OPTIMAL DESIGN OF ROLLING-CONTACT BEARINGS VIA EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS RKB TECHNICAL REVIEW - APRIL 2011 used. A typical case would be that when one wants high performance, while aiming to reduce, as much as possible, the costs. Objective functions can be the mass of single parts or subassemblies, radial or axial basic dynamic load rating of bearings, minimum thickness of the elastohydrodynamic lubricant film between the rolling element and bearing raceway, deformations of components of construction, potential energy stored, efficiency of transmission etc. A very important step in building an...

 Open the catalog to page 4
RKB Optimal Design of Rolling-Contact Bearings Via Evolutionary Algorithms-5

OPTIMAL DESIGN OF ROLLING-CONTACT BEARINGS VIA EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS RKB TECHNICAL REVIEW - APRIL 2011 Fig. 2 - Bi-objective Pareto front 6. What are Evolutionary Algorithms? If one goes for the optimal design option, the next step is to select the instrument for solving the mathematical programming problem. Most traditional techniques for the optimization of systems of several parameters involve the calculation of the first and second order partial derivatives of the objective function with respect to all variables. However, the situations where the analytical approach is difficult (large...

 Open the catalog to page 5
RKB Optimal Design of Rolling-Contact Bearings Via Evolutionary Algorithms-6

OPTIMAL DESIGN OF ROLLING-CONTACT BEARINGS VIA EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS RKB TECHNICAL REVIEW - APRIL 2011 Fig. 3 - Principle of a very simple Evolutionary Algorithm Since the simplest EAs are good at exploring the solution space (because they search from a set of designs and not from a single design solution), their important drawback is that they are not well suited to perform finely tuned search. Starting from an idea of P. Moscato (1989) it has been argued (Hart, 1994; Wolpert, 1997; Culberson, 1998; Goldberg 1999) that it is essential to incorporate some form of domain knowledge into EAs to...

 Open the catalog to page 6

All RKB Europe catalogs and technical brochures

  1. Project S12

    2  Pages

  2. This Is RKB

    24  Pages

  3. Project "EPB"

    2  Pages

  4. Project "MDU"

    2  Pages

  5. Project "ABI"

    2  Pages

  6. Made in RKB

    1  Page

  7. Why RKB

    1  Page

*Prices are pre-tax. They exclude delivery charges and customs duties and do not include additional charges for installation or activation options. Prices are indicative only and may vary by country, with changes to the cost of raw materials and exchange rates.