Improving the Accuracy of Bump Height and Coplanarity Measurement
4Pages

{{requestButtons}}

Catalog excerpts

Improving the Accuracy of Bump Height and Coplanarity Measurement - 1

SEMICONDUCTORS PACKAGING • MEMS • LEDS • DISPLAYS DECEMBER 2016 SEMICONDUCTORS PACKAGING • MEMS • LEDS • DISPLAYS DECEMBER 2016 Insights for El ^ MRAM Takes State NOLOGY ctronics Manufacturing www.solid-state.co MEDIA

Open the catalog to page 1
Improving the Accuracy of Bump Height and Coplanarity Measurement - 2

Improving the accuracy of bump height and coplanarity measurement SCOTT BALAK , Rudolph Technologies, Inc., Bloomington, MN A new approach to bump height measurements uses an interferometric technique to accurately measure bump height and PL thickness older bumps are used to connect die to various package components in advanced packaging processes. Bump height and coplanarity are critical to ensuring reliable connections. A bump that is not high enough will not connect, while one that is too tall may prevent connection by neighboring bumps or even damage an electrical tester’s probing card....

Open the catalog to page 2
Improving the Accuracy of Bump Height and Coplanarity Measurement - 3

between the chip and the substrate. In addition to eliminating the IMC as a source of failure, UFI reduces package cost and cycle time by eliminating layers, and allows a significant reduction in final package thickness. Unfortunately, the PL layer, which is semitransparent and varies in thickness, introduces errors in bump height measurements (FIGURE 1). Many technologies are available that can accurately measure bump height but are too slow to inspect the millions of bumps on a full wafer. Laser triangulation (LT) is fast enough but has difficulty accurately measuring the top surface of...

Open the catalog to page 3
Improving the Accuracy of Bump Height and Coplanarity Measurement - 4

FIGURE 7. Corrected LT bump height measurements from a full wafer 100% inspection. FIGURE 5. A comparison of VTSS and LT bump height measurements shows a consistent offset. In this example the LT measurement exceeds the more accurate VTSS measurement by an average of 2.123μm. FIGURE 6 shows the results of a repeatability study in which bump heights were measured for ~12,000 bumps from 13 dies across a wafer. The accompanying wafer map shows the locations of the sampled die. 3D height inspection was performed using 5µm spot sensors. The repeatability test was dynamic, meaning the wafer was...

Open the catalog to page 4

All Onto Innovation Inc. catalogs and technical brochures