1. Catalogs
  2. MEREFSA, S.L.U.
  3. Encapsulated FEP silicone o-rings

Encapsulated FEP silicone o-rings

Encapsulated FEP silicone o-rings

Encapsulated FEP silicone o-rings

Product catalog summary
PTFE Encapsulated FEP Silicone O-Rings
Overview: Encapsulated silicone o-rings with FEP or PFA are available in various cross-sectional shapes and sizes, including round, rectangular, square, and oval. They are suitable for Camlok-type fittings and can be solid or hollow, with no restrictions on the inside diameter.
Why Use Encapsulated Gaskets? Conventional rubbers may not be suitable for certain applications due to corrosion or high temperatures, which can lead to premature aging and leaks. Encapsulated gaskets are recommended in such scenarios for enhanced durability.
O-Ring Material Comparison:
  • Pure PTFE O-Ring: Offers excellent chemical resistance but lacks flexibility, making it unsuitable for compression gaskets.
  • PTFE Sandwich: Economical but prone to side permeation, making it vulnerable to chemical attacks.
  • PTFE-Coated O-Rings: Provide lower friction but lack a durable chemical-resistant barrier.
  • Perfluorelastomer O-Rings: Offer superior chemical resistance across a wide temperature range but are costly.
  • Metal O-Rings: Good chemical resistance and high-pressure capacity but are rigid and expensive.
  • Encapsulated O-Rings: Ideal for static seals, combining excellent chemical resistance with flexibility. Silicone cores are suitable for FDA-approved applications and food contact, with FEP covers limiting temperature range compared to PFA, which is stable up to +260 ºC and offers better abrasion and pressure resistance.
See more

Catalog excerpts

Encapsulated FEP silicone o-rings-1

Encapsulated silicone with FEP or PFA, in round, rectangular, square, oval cross section and for Camlok-type fittings, solid or hollow, with no limit as to inside diameter of the o-ring. <j,Why use encapsulated gaskets? In some applications the use of conventional rubbers is forbidden. Corrosion or high temperatures may have devastating effects on o-rings, causing premature ageing and leaks, therefore it is recommended to use encapsulated gaskets in these circumstances. O-ring material comparison: Pure PTFE o-ring: PTFE is inert and gives an excellent chemical resistance, but as a rigid plastic with practically no memory it cannot be used as a compression gasket since, once removed, it will not ensure proper sealing. PTFE sandwich: even though these gaskets are cheaper due to their design, the possibility of side permeation makes them a weak gasket which can be quickly attacked by chemical products. PTFE-coated o-rings: With acrylic or latex emulsions with PTFE you can obtain a lower friction coefficient but they do not provide a chemical resistant barrier and the coating gets damaged very easily. MEREFSA ■ [email protected] ■ Cobalto, 101, 08907 Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona (Spain) ■ Tel. 00 34 933 372 081 ■ Fax 00 34 933 374 373

 Open the catalog to page 1
Encapsulated FEP silicone o-rings-2

Perfluorelastomer o-rings: The most advanced material, it provides a fantastic chemical resistance in a very wide range of temperatures but its high cost makes these impossible to use in many occasions. Metal o-rings: they have a good chemical resistance and an excellent working capacity under high pressures, but they are very rigid and often expensive. Encapsulated o-rings: Always used as a static seal, FEP and PFA give an excellent chemical resistance and the silicone body a flexibility that plastic does not have. A silicone (-60 a +260 °C) core will be preferably used in conditions where FDA...

 Open the catalog to page 2
*Prices are pre-tax. They exclude delivery charges and customs duties and do not include additional charges for installation or activation options. Prices are indicative only and may vary by country, with changes to the cost of raw materials and exchange rates.