1. Catalogs
  2. CORNING Display Technologies
  3. Fracture Behavior and Intrinsic Strength of FPD Substrates
video corpo

Fracture Behavior and Intrinsic Strength of FPD Substrates

Fracture Behavior and Intrinsic Strength of FPD Substrates

Fracture Behavior and Intrinsic Strength of FPD Substrates

Product catalog summary
Abstract
The paper discusses the fracture behavior and intrinsic strength of Flat Panel Display (FPD) substrates, focusing on how different glass compositions affect the strength of the final display. It highlights the impact of the scoring process on glass strength, particularly for AMLCD substrates.

Introduction
The choice of substrate in FPDs is crucial for display strength. As FPD technology evolves, understanding the mechanical properties of glass and their impact on display reliability becomes essential.

Functional Strength of Glass
Glass failure often starts at surface flaws. The functional strength of glass is influenced by both intrinsic properties and extrinsic factors like surface flaws. Fracture toughness is a key measure of intrinsic strength, with most glasses having a narrow range of values.

Score and Break Process
The score and break process is critical in determining the mechanical robustness of displays. The quality of the scored edge, influenced by factors like score wheel geometry and scoring pressure, affects the final display strength. Different glasses respond differently to scoring, impacting their robustness.

Experimental Method and Results
The study compares two types of glass used in AMLCDs: Corning Code 1737 and Glass A. Code 1737 shows better resistance to lateral crack formation due to its composition, which affects its response to scoring.

Impact Upon Panel Strength
The subsurface damage during scoring is a key factor in panel strength. Code 1737's composition makes it more resistant to lateral cracks, enhancing its edge strength compared to Glass A.

Structural Interpretation of Substrate Behaviors
The differences in glass behavior under load are linked to their compositions. Code 1737, with a higher former/modifier ratio, shows better mechanical properties and fatigue resistance.

Conclusions
The mechanical response of glass substrates to scoring significantly influences the strength of AMLCD panels. Glasses like Code 1737, with a high former/modifier ratio, optimize mechanical strength.

Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. J. C. Lapp for technical discussions and insights into glass failure.

References
The document cites several studies and papers that provide additional context and support for the findings discussed.
See more

Catalog excerpts

Fracture Behavior and Intrinsic Strength of FPD Substrates-1

Fracture Behavior and Intrinsic Strength of FPD Substrates Technical Information Paper TIP 203 Issued: November 2004 Supercedes: February 2003 R. A. Allaire and P. L. Bocko Technology Group, Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY 14831 Paper presented at SID 1996 – San Diego, CA Abstract The ultimate practical strength of an FPD depends largely upon the fracture behavior of its substrate. Commercial FPD substrates differ substantially in their response to localized stresses occurring in panel score and break processes, edge finishing and packaging. The scoring process, used as a reliable and inexpensive technique for the sizing of glass sheets, in particular, can have a substantial effect upon the strength of the final display. This paper will review the effect of glass composition on score behavior and its impact on AMLCD glass substrates. Introduction The choice of the substrate for flat panel displays directly impacts the strength of the final display. As FPD technology extends into new applications, the issue of display strength is becoming increasingly a priority. This paper will discuss intrinsic glass mechanical properties and behaviors in the display fabrication process that control display reliability. In a previous paper by the authors1 , a broad discussion was presented on intrinsic glass properties that can influence AMLCD robustness. The properties discussed included thermal expansion coefficient (its effect upon thermal shock resistance) mechanical properties that influence the functional strength of glass, and glass thermal properties that enabled the use of advanced display component technologies. It was asserted that low expansion, high strain point glasses with favorable deformation and fracture properties would optimize the mechanical reliability of AMLCDs. Functional Strength of Glass Failure of glass under load usually initiates at a preexisting surface flaw; therefore, extrinsic factors such as the quantity and characteristics of surface flaws determine the functional strength of glass as much as intrinsic material properties. Fracture toughness is the material property that is most commonly used to quantify the intrinsic strength of a material. When compared to the range of fracture toughness values for crystalline materials, glasses have

 Open the catalog to page 1
Fracture Behavior and Intrinsic Strength of FPD Substrates-2

a much more narrow range of fracture toughness values even across a broad very disparate compositional types than there is in crystalline materials. Almost all glasses have fracture toughness in the range of 0.6 to 0.8 Mpa.m1/2 . In actual experience, significant variation is seen in the mechanical robustness between glasses composition types even when differences in the extrinsic factors are removed. For example, differences between substrate glasses microscopic behavior in the score and break process are indeed determined strongly by composition factors and can make substantial impact on the...

 Open the catalog to page 2
Fracture Behavior and Intrinsic Strength of FPD Substrates-3

An unwanted secondary fracture morphology that occurs during the scribe process is the lateral crack. Lateral cracks occur in a direction approximately perpendicular to that of median ("good") crack. This was also measured for Code 1737 and glass A in the same score load regime. As seen in figure 2, substantially higher lateral crack growth occurs in glass A at lower score load than that in Code 1737. Impact Upon Panel Strength Supporting microscopic analysis was done that graphically illustrates the fundamental qualitative difference in how the two glasses fractured under the score load. The...

 Open the catalog to page 3
Fracture Behavior and Intrinsic Strength of FPD Substrates-4

Structural Interpretation of Substrate Behaviors Differences between the response of different types of glass compositions under local load has been well documented in the literature3,4. At this early stage in the analysis of fracture behavior of AMLCD glass compositions, a detailed structural interpretation is premature. However, inspection of the glasses compositions suggests a qualitative explanation. Code 1737 and glass A have similar compositions at first glance. They are both non-alkali boroaluminosilicates containing a mixture of alkaline earths (RO: MgO, CaO, SrO and BaO). In glass chemistry...

 Open the catalog to page 4
Fracture Behavior and Intrinsic Strength of FPD Substrates-5

North America and all other Countries Corning Display Technologies MP-HQ-W1 Corning, NY 14831 United States Telephone: +1 607-974-9000 Fax: +1 607-974-7097 Internet: www.corning.com/displaytechnologies Japan Corning Japan K.K. Main Office No. 35 Kowa Building, 1st Floor 1-14-14, Akasaka Minato-Ku, Tokyo 107-0052 Japan Telephone: +81 3-5562-2260 Fax: +81 3-5562-2263 Internet: www.corning.co.jp Nagoya Sales Office Nagoya Bldg., 7 F 4-6-18, Mei-eki, Nakamura-ku Nagoya-shi, Aichi 450-0002 Japan Telephone: +81 52-561-0341 Fax: +81 52-561-0348 China Corning (China) Ltd., Shanghai Representative Office...

 Open the catalog to page 5
Related Searches
*Prices are pre-tax. They exclude delivery charges and customs duties and do not include additional charges for installation or activation options. Prices are indicative only and may vary by country, with changes to the cost of raw materials and exchange rates.