Catalogue Verabar brochure
veris-inc.com
print switch display
Page / 6
Make a request   
VERIS -
/ 6
See other catalogues for VERIS
Text version of the page
Verabar Compared to Orifice Plates
Through Accuracy of Measurement, Low Installed and Operating Costs, Verabar Proves Its Performance, Efficiency and Value.
Orifice Plate Test Results
Florida Gas Transmission Company conducted a test to quantify various
% Deviation
Verabar Maintains Its Accuracy
Orifice plates show long term
Condition
Wear of knife edge: 0.010"
-2.2 -4.5
conditions which can result in inaccu­rate measurement. A partial list of the
deterioration of accuracy.
0.020"
0.050"
-13.1
The initial accuracy of the orifice plate is ±1%. However, long term
results is shown:
Dirt and grease
deposits in pipe
accuracy deteriorates unless the plate
-11.1
is periodically inspected. Senior, dual chamber fittings are available to check
Valve lubr. (-24%) Warpage (-9,6%)
Valve lubrication upstream: one side of plate
-15.8
-24.0
the plate without requiring system shutdown, but such fittings are very
both sides
Wear (-13.1%)-Dirt & grease (-11.1%) ~
expensive.
Leaks around plate
-8.2
Plate warpage
-9.6
Leaks (-8.2%)
Savings in Weld Time
Installed Cost Savings
Verabar Lowers Installed
Costs
Verabar can save you more than 60%
in installation costs over an orifice
plate in a 10" pipe.
The graph shows the total installed
cost by pipe size of the orifice plate,
the Verabar, and the resultant Verabar savings. The most significant portion of the savings is the reduction in the linear inches of weld.
Dollar Savings $ 100,000
$ 50,000
Only 4 Inches of linear welding
=
_
_
_
Or
fice
Ins
tailed Co
r___r ns
t_____
ost Savin
gs
---~
V
erabar
In
stalled Cc
st
-
-
$ 10,000 $ 5,000
$1,000 $ 500
20 30 40
Pipe Size (Inches)
10
48
Verabar vs. Orifice
Operating Cost Savings
Verabar Has the Lowest Operating Costs
Horsepower Savings @ $ 0.05/KWH 300 200
100 50
Dollar Savings
$ 100,000 $ 50,000
Verabar pays for itself in less than a year.
The graph shows the yearly operating cost savings and equivalent horsepower
savings of the non-constricting, low
permanent pressure loss Verabar
compared to the extremely constricting,
high permanent pressure loss orifice plate. Savings are shown for gases,
liquids and steam—at typical design velocities, by pipe size.
$ 10,000 $ 5,000
$1,000 $ 500
10 5
1-1-
10
— 20 30 Pipe Size (Inches)
40
48
DirectIndustry's Virtual Technical Library: PDF Catalogue | Technical Documentation | Brochure | Manual | Industrial directory | Specifications | Characteristics
Search Go
page 1 p.1
page 2 p.2
page 3 p.3
page 4 p.4
page 5 p.5
page 6 p.6
pdf-page pdf di En 2008-10-42-13