| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | | Verabar Compared to Orifice Plates | | |
| | | |
| | | Through Accuracy of Measurement, Low Installed and Operating Costs, Verabar Proves Its Performance, Efficiency and Value. | | |
| | | |
| | | Orifice Plate Test Results Florida Gas Transmission Company conducted a test to quantify various | | % Deviation | | |
| | | Verabar Maintains Its Accuracy Orifice plates show long term | | | Condition | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | Wear of knife edge: 0.010" | | |
| | | -2.2 -4.5 | | |
| | | |
| | | conditions which can result in inaccurate measurement. A partial list of the | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | deterioration of accuracy. | | |
| | | 0.020" | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | 0.050" | | |
| | | -13.1 | | |
| | | |
| | | The initial accuracy of the orifice plate is ±1%. However, long term | | |
| | | results is shown: | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | Dirt and grease deposits in pipe | | |
| | | |
| | | accuracy deteriorates unless the plate | | |
| | | -11.1 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | is periodically inspected. Senior, dual chamber fittings are available to check | | |
| | | Valve lubr. (-24%) Warpage (-9,6%) | | Valve lubrication upstream: one side of plate | | |
| | | | -15.8 -24.0 | | |
| | | the plate without requiring system shutdown, but such fittings are very | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | both sides | | |
| | | |
| | | Wear (-13.1%)-Dirt & grease (-11.1%) ~ | | |
| | | |
| | | expensive. | | |
| | | Leaks around plate | | |
| | | -8.2 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | Plate warpage | | |
| | | -9.6 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | Leaks (-8.2%) | | |
| | | |
| | | Savings in Weld Time | | Installed Cost Savings | | |
| | | Verabar Lowers Installed | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | Costs Verabar can save you more than 60% in installation costs over an orifice plate in a 10" pipe. The graph shows the total installed cost by pipe size of the orifice plate, the Verabar, and the resultant Verabar savings. The most significant portion of the savings is the reduction in the linear inches of weld. | | |
| | | Dollar Savings $ 100,000 $ 50,000 | | |
| | | Only 4 Inches of linear welding | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | = | | | | | | | | | | _ | _ | _ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Or | fice | | | | | | | | | Ins | tailed Co | | | | | | | | | | | r___r ns | t_____ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ost Savin | gs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ---~ | | | | | | | V | erabar | In | stalled Cc | st | | | | | | | | | - | - | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | $ 10,000 $ 5,000 $1,000 $ 500 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | 20 30 40 Pipe Size (Inches) | | |
| | | 10 | | | 48 | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | Verabar vs. Orifice | | Operating Cost Savings | | |
| | | Verabar Has the Lowest Operating Costs | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | Horsepower Savings @ $ 0.05/KWH 300 200 100 50 | | |
| | | |
| | | Dollar Savings $ 100,000 $ 50,000 | | |
| | | Verabar pays for itself in less than a year. The graph shows the yearly operating cost savings and equivalent horsepower savings of the non-constricting, low permanent pressure loss Verabar compared to the extremely constricting, high permanent pressure loss orifice plate. Savings are shown for gases, liquids and steam—at typical design velocities, by pipe size. | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | $ 10,000 $ 5,000 $1,000 $ 500 | | |
| | | 10 5 1-1- | | |
| | | 10 | | — 20 30 Pipe Size (Inches) | | 40 | | 48 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |