Capacitance Sensors Offer Advantages for Thread Inspection Applications - MTI Instruments - #1 |
|
You may also be interested in
Controller, Proximity sensor, Testing machine, Balancing machine, Displacement sensor
Text version of the page
MTI Instruments, Inc.
325 Washington Avenue Extension
Albany, NY 12205
PH: +1-518-218-2550
OR USA TOLL FREE: 1-800-342-2203
FX: +1-518-218-2506
sales@mtiinstruments.com
www.mtiinstruments.com
APPLICATION NOTE
Capacitance Sensors Offer Advantages for
Thread Inspection Applications
Introduction
Many manufacturers today, especially suppliers to the automotive industry, insist on
100% inspection of the quality of internal threads on critical parts and components.
This reduces the probability of adding future “value” to a part that, in the end, may
need to be scrapped. In addition, improperly tapped holes must not reach consumers
to avoid warranty concerns, assure customer satisfaction and reduce potential liability.
Proper inspection can also pinpoint optimal tool change intervals, saving thousands
of dollars per year. The following paper outlines the use of capacitance sensors and
their advantage over screw and eddy current systems.
The Problem
Manual inspection is slow, not always reliable and tedious for the inspector. Because
of this manufacturers have struggled to come up with ways to reliably automate
the process at a reasonable cost. Automated systems are available that use “screw
sensors” which consist of a motorized stage that monitors torque as a test piece is
screwed into a bore hole. An abnormally high torque value indicates a crossed thread,
an insuffi cient thread depth or possible debris in the hole. Low torque may indicate
missing threads and/or a larger than desired hole diameter. Unfortunately the test screw can quickly wear or be cross
threaded, requiring operator attention and a tooling change. Additionally, the motorized torque stage is not cheap, often
putting the price tag beyond reach for typical applications. And fi nally, a worn screw can provide false rejections leading
to the unnecessary scrapping of parts.
Eddy current systems can also be automated. Their output is compared to the signature of a stored “ideal master” as
the probe is stroked in and out of the hole being inspected. If the signatures match within preset limits the parts are
accepted, otherwise they fail. Unfortunately eddy current technology relies on the magnetic properties of the material
being measured and if fl uctuations occur the accuracy can be affected. In addition, for proper operation, eddy current
probes should be calibrated to the specifi c material being measured for optimal performance, which is not always easily
accomplished.
MTII appnote: threads.pdf - Page 1 of 2
|
|