See other catalogues for
Microscan
You may also be interested in
Text version of the page
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | | T. he routing of connectivity cables should be carefully designed to minimize the risk of damage. Scanning Considerations. Designers value compact components, and bar code readers are no exception. However, more important than the size of the reader is the space available for reading. Designers need to calculate the scan envelope before specifying a bar code reader. Smaller scan envelopes offer the design advantage of requiring less physical space between the reader and the bar code. For someone assessing readers' specifications comparatively, the speed parameter can be misleading. A scanner's decode rate often is more important than the more commonly cited read rate for embedded applications, because it determines how fast the scanner will be able to process the encoded data and send it to the host. Interface Considerations. Triggers that tell the scanner when to look for the bar code arc divided into two categories: discrete (external) and serial ( software). Which type to include generally depends on the designer's preference for programming or wiring. Discrete triggers are separate sensors, or object detectors, that can be wired directly into the reader. They typicallv require much less programming than serial triggers. Serial triggers arc dispatched from an external device, such as a programmable logic controller or host personal computer, that tells the reader to look for a bar code. Serial triggers are often used | | |
| | | in embedded applications to provide greater control. Once the bar code is decoded, the reader can output the data in the particular format required for a specific process. Interface software should be designed to initialize the reader, check for status, and create a robust realtime communication protocol between reader and host. Conclusion Bar codes have proven their value for ensuring the accuracy of medical information and protecting patient safety. The value of bar code reader components for IVD manufacturers is changing because of recent technology advances. Now is a good time for instrumentation manufacturers to reexamine available bar code component technology in order to sec whether these advances can provide performance or total-cost-of-ownership advantages in embedded designs. The use of bar codes in laboratories and hospitals continues to increase, so I VD equipment must evolve to meet growing needs. —Niels Wartenberg, Microscan Systems (Ronton, WA) | | |
| | | 0m gS oa 5° 3I ho Së °3 on | | |
| | | |
| | | More information about the products and services of companies in this section is posted on the IVD TechnologyVJeb site at: medical I I, www.ivdtechnoiogy.com. device L.I 11\ | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | ivdtecnnology.com IVD TECHNOLOGY | OCTOBER 2007 79 | | |
| | | |
| | | MICROSCAN | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |