See other catalogues for
ISD Group
You may also be interested in
Text version of the page
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | | | | |
| | | |
| | | Picture the Future! | | |
| | | |
| | | cal Development | | |
| | | |
| | | SIGNIFICANT FACTORS Increase of product variants and intensification of 1 customer demands Harder price competition From growth era to quality era | | |
| | | Today the manufacturing industry is put under ever increasing pressure by the growing complexity of modern products and individual customer "wish lists". The market now demands a swift response to customer requests without loss of quality or service. | | |
| | | Product liability Internationalisation and globalisation of markets Shorter development periods International technical trends | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | As the highest costs in manufacturing are incurred by product planning and engineering bases, the increasingly aggressive competition in the marketplace is forcing many companies to reexamine the economic efficiency and versatility of their CAD workstation. In this context a switch from 2-D to 3-D is often considered. Companies already working with a 3-D system appreciate | | |
| | | the competitive advantages it provides, especially when formulating tenders, in work preparation, and prototype construction or quality control. It also enables 3-D product models to be generated in the early stages of design, thus allowing the product to be easily visualised and its efficiency tested. As a result the error rate falls, productivity improves and costs are radically reduced. | | Taking dramatic steps to move forward is necessary to be a manufacturing contender in the next decade, but in spite of this many companies hesitate as they are concerned about the risks and expenses associated with a switch to 3-D. These concerns are unnecessary if the appropriate CAD system is chosen. | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |